Judge Orders Apple to Allow External Payment Options For App Store

Epic v. Apple judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued an order saying Apple must comply with an order to let developers add links and buttons to external payment options, denying the company’s motion for a stay. The order comes after a Tuesday hearing concerning the blockbuster antitrust lawsuit, which Fortnite publisher Epic Games filed in 2020 and which went to trial this year.

Judge Rodgers’ new order reads, “Apple’s motion is based on a selective reading of this Court’s findings and ignores all of the findings which supported the injunction.” During the hearing, Apple said it needed more time to rewrite its anti-steering policies rules that block app developers from linking to payment methods besides the iOS App Store.

Apple has mostly praised the ruling in Epic v. Apple where Judge Gonzalez Rogers concluded that Apple hadn’t violated antitrust law by kicking Fortnite off the App Store and said the company didn’t have to restate Epic’s developer account. But it appealed the section saying that Apple’s anti-steering policies hid relevant information from users and demanding that it remove them.

Apple attorney Mark Perry said, “This will be the first time Apple has ever allowed live links in an app for digital content. It’s going to take months to figure out the engineering, economic, business, and other issues. It is exceedingly complicated. There have to be guardrails and guidelines to protect children, to protect developers, to protect consumers, to protect Apple. And they have to be written into guidelines that can be explained and enforced and applied.”

Perry noted that Apple already made one of the two required changes. In August, as part of a class action lawsuit settlement, it removed a rule restricting how developers could contact users via email. But Apple has portrayed in-app links as a unique threat to user trust and safety, saying they could let developers scam users or send them to malicious sites.

“We believe that these changes, if Apple is forced to implement them, will upset the platform. They will harm consumers. They will harm developers. That is a fact. It is going to happen,” said Perry. Epic framed Apple’s request as a delay tactic made without any real commitment to change. “Apple does nothing unless it is forced to do it,” said Epic attorney Gary Bornstein.

Judge Gonzalez Rogers was skeptical of Apple’s request particularly because it asked for an indefinite stay of the injunction despite saying Apple just wanted more time to evaluate risks. She said, “You haven’t asked for additional time. You’ve asked for an injunction which would effectively take years.”


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *